You can buy an 870 security express with an 18" barrel for $350 or less. I'd take that route, and did.
You already have one...I don't hunt at all now, and I'm in need of a decent home defense shotgun
a 18" is much better than a long barrel. putting that long barrel through doorways going through a house just gives the bad guy more to grab on to in defense, and the last thing you want is to fight for a gun against a guy that is obviously nutty because he's in your house. this is why i prefer a pistol for HD your likely going to get shot before you take it away from me.Thanks everyone. I think I'd like a shorter barrel, but I guess I don't *need* one. Anything I can do to lessen the recoil?
Also, is 00 Buckshot the best choice for HD? I live in a brick ranch with drywall walls.
No pics at the moment, but it's your standard 870 Express.
I would say OP should check out Box O Truth before you decide buckshot or birdshot.birdshot is better for HD than buckshot is.
Man, you know your stuff about long-range shooting, but not so much with shotgun shells. Birdshot will leave a very ugly shallow surface wound, but it will not be debilitating. The light birdshot just does not have the inertia to penetrate deeply enough to take out vital organs. Buckshot is definately the way to go when shooting human targets.birdshot is better for HD than buckshot is. what doesnt hit the intended target is stopped much easier by drywall, thats not saying it wont still penetrate. and somebody shot up close with a good tight pattern of birdshot aint getting back up. birdshot is always my first choice for HD, inside 10 yards it will **** stuff up.
the key is the pattern, yes if it patterns out then its not going to penetrate enough, but held in a tight pattern, it will leave way more than a surface wound, patterned tight enough inside 10 yards it CAN penetrate the entire human body. but the key is the pattern.Man, you know your stuff about long-range shooting, but not so much with shotgun shells. Birdshot will leave a very ugly shallow surface wound, but it will not be debilitating. The light birdshot just does not have the inertia to penetrate deeply enough to take out vital organs. Buckshot is definately the way to go when shooting human targets.
If birdshot was better than buckshot, don't you think the military and law-enforcement communities would have caught on to that fact by now? Both still use buckshot and/or slugs in their shotguns.